The 2-Minute Rule for religious based asylum case laws usa
The 2-Minute Rule for religious based asylum case laws usa
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution could be justified when The fundamental norm underlying a Constitution disappears and also a new system is set in its place.
When the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by both party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and proceed according to your law. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
The ruling with the first court created case law that must be followed by other courts until or Except if either new legislation is created, or perhaps a higher court rules differently.
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as established forth would not apply, since the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, alternatively he has been acquitted with the criminal charges based on evidence and it truly is nicely-settled regulation that once the civil servant is acquitted in the criminal case, then on this very charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment through the department and held him disqualified for the post because acquittal for all potential purposes. The aforesaid proposition has actually been established at naught from the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case from the District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of the laws, the legal system adheres on the doctrine of stare decisis
When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, when it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it's actually very vague about whether the 90-working day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based on the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held to the 90-day notice prerequisite, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it can be unclear how it applies to any specified situation, generally rendering judgments based about the intent of lawmakers along with the circumstances in the case at hand. This sort of decisions become a guide for long term similar cases.
10. Without touching the merits of your case from the issue of once-a-year increases in the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of your provincial government, this kind of yearly increase, if permissible while in the case of employees of KMC, involves further assessment to become made with the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance due to funding issues and lack of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may well interfere with the conclusion or check here maybe the finding and mildew the relief to make it proper for the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or even the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified from the decision on the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair to your offender plus the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
ten. Based on the findings in the inquiry committee, this petition is not thought of maintainable and is also therefore liable to become dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have read the uncovered counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this factor for interim custody of the subject premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but may be used as persuasive authority, which is to provide substance for the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.